<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Page comments</title>
		<link>http://www.silverstripe.org/home/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://www.silverstripe.org/home/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>

		
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.silverstripe.org/#PageComment_9110</link>
			<description>Great stuff!<br /><br />Thanks for explaining the differences between using nested and non-nested URLs with SS for a non-techie like myself.<br /><br />I am very glad you have decided to still give the developer the choice of whether or not to choose nested URLs. We are thinking of switching to non-nested from the default to afford greater freedom in moving pages around and keeping the same URL for each page.<br /><br />The greater the flexibility afforded to content writers with URLs the better!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:13:47 +1300</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
			<guid>http://www.silverstripe.org/#PageComment_9110</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.silverstripe.org/#PageComment_5550</link>
			<description>Great stuff, this is the way links should be :-)<br /><br />I&#39;m looking forward to using 2.4 on a client project soon :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 05:01:59 +1200</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BjÃ¸rn BÃ¸rresen</dc:creator>
			<guid>http://www.silverstripe.org/#PageComment_5550</guid>
		</item>
		

	</channel>
</rss>