Skip to main content

This site requires you to update your browser. Your browsing experience maybe affected by not having the most up to date version.

Customising the CMS /

Moderators: martimiz, Sean, biapar, Willr, Ingo, swaiba

[SOLVED] Grouping SelectionGroup or Labels for SelectionGroups


Go to End
Reply


3 Posts   2215 Views

Avatar
derralf

Community Member, 24 Posts

18 March 2009 at 11:16pm

Edited: 20/03/2009 11:03am

Hello Community,

is it possible to group SelectionGroups in CMS or make a label for a SelectionGroup?
I have 2 SelectionGroups to chose options for has_many images: GalerieLayout and GalerieDisplayMode

The SelectionGroups are displaying in my tab like this:

o Columns
o Rows
o Lightbox
o Gallerific

And what i want is this:

Layout ((one SelectionGroup))
o Rows
o Columns

Display ((other SelectionGroup))
o Lightbox
o Gallerific

any ideas or hints?
thanks in advance,
Ralf

my code:

$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Content.GalerieSettings',
		new SelectionGroup('GalerieLayout', array(
    		"rows//Rows (Standard)" => new HiddenField(""),
		"columns//Columns" => new HiddenField("")
		))
);
	
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Content.GalerieSettings',
		new SelectionGroup('GalerieDisplayMode', array(
    		"gallerific//Gallerific (Standard)" => new HiddenField(""),
		"lightbox//Lightbox" => new HiddenField("")
		))
);

Avatar
theAlien

Community Member, 131 Posts

20 March 2009 at 4:56am

Edited: 20/03/2009 4:58am

Hi,

I don't have any experience with selectiongroups, so I checked the API and the file in sapphire/forms/SelectionGroup.php.

As far as I understand it, there is no way to display the $name of the selectiongroup right now (in your setup it would be GallerieLayout and GallerieDisplayMode). However... there is a workaround (add it above your Layout-selectiongroup and add another one above your Display-selectiongroup)

$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Content.GallerieSettings', new LiteralField(
    "myTitle",
    "<p style='font-size:11px; color:#444'>Layout</p>"
));

The HTML-tags are just in there to show you can do almost anything inside a LiteralField (even adding <img>-tags).

Instead of a LiteralField you could also use a LabelField, a HeaderField or one of the other Dataless/Utility form fieldtypes.

Avatar
derralf

Community Member, 24 Posts

20 March 2009 at 10:57am

Great! That will do it. And it's much more flexible...
Thanks