Skip to main content

This site requires you to update your browser. Your browsing experience maybe affected by not having the most up to date version.

We're retiring the forums!

The SilverStripe forums have passed their heyday. They'll stick around, but will be read only. We'd encourage you to get involved in the community via the following channels instead:

General Questions /

General questions about getting started with SilverStripe that don't fit in any of the categories above.

Moderators: martimiz, Sean, Ed, biapar, Willr, Ingo, swaiba

Routing - issues replacing ModelAsControler


Go to End


597 Views

Avatar
martimiz

Forum Moderator, 1391 Posts

25 November 2012 at 7:31am

Hi,
Basically I understand how the new yaml routes should be working. But the current issue baffles me. What I'm trying to do is use a different controller instead of the current ModelAsController. So someting like

rules:
'$URLSegment//$Action/$ID/OtherID': 'MyModelAsController'

this works very well, placing the fragment After: framework#coreroutes, just like the docs suggest. But now other urls like admin and dev are unaccessible. Of course 'After' may be anywhere after, so there should probably be a 'Before' as well. I'm thinking before framework#coreroutes.

But whatever I try, it always results in an error saying that two fragments want to be after each other. There's hardly any combination I didn't try, including renaming my module from aaa to zzz. I did trace the order in which the rules are parsed based on the output from ConfigManifest, but I just don't seem to be able to exactly position the fragment.

What am I missing?